Skip to content

3D Printing Has Untapped Potential for Climate Mitigation in the Cement Sector (2023-02)

10.1038/s44172-023-00054-7

Gangotra Ankita,  del Gado Emanuela,  Lewis Joanna
Journal Article - Communications Engineering, Vol. 2, Iss. 1

Abstract

Cementitious products, such as concrete and cement, are some of the most used resources in the world, second only to water in terms of consumption. In the coming decades the demand for cementitious materials and new construction will continue to increase due to a rising global population and urbanization. The production of cement currently contributes to approximately 8% of global CO2 emissions. Cement production and use in construction are responsible for up to 77% and 8% of the emissions respectively from the entire lifecycle of cement and of concrete, from production to end-of-life1. In cement production, over 50% of the total CO2 emissions are caused by chemical processes due to calcination i.e., the breakdown of limestone to form clinker, the main reactive component in cement products, and the thermal energy used for the process of calcination accounts for 40% of the CO2 emissions. Due to both these inherent material manufacturing processes and to rising global demand, cement is widely considered to be a ‘hard-toabate’ sector in a global climate mitigation. Low-carbon technologies for cement can be implemented through both production-centric policies targeting the cement production process and consumption-centric policies targeting the end-use of cement in construction. Yet all currently proposed solutions fall short of the systemic changes that could be achieved through the scaling of 3D printing applications in the construction sector. For example, in its latest technology roadmap for cement, the International Energy Agency proposes four technological strategies to lower emissions from the production of cement: (1) clinker substitution, (2) energy efficiency, (3) switching to alternative fuels, and (4) emerging carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies2; the same strategies emphasized in other decarbonization strategies for the cement sector1,3. All of these roadmaps for decarbonizing the cement sector recognize that while existing low-carbon cement technologies will help with partial CO2 mitigation, newer, breakthrough low-carbon technologies are required to achieve carbon neutrality in the cement and concrete supply chain by mid-century. Cement-based construction 3D printing (C3DP), also known as cement-based additive manufacturing or digital construction, is an emerging technology that, while omitted from all current roadmaps for decarbonizing the cement sector, has a potential ofbecoming a climate solution for the cement sector, reducing the embodied carbon in new constructions. C3DP is sometimes used to refer to construction 3D printing as a whole, which also includes the use of plastics and metals for construction. In this comment C3DP only refers to cement-based 3D printing.

16 References

  1. Abdalla Hadeer, Fattah Kazi, Abdallah Mohamed, Tamimi Adil (2021-10)
    Environmental Footprint and Economics of a Full-Scale 3D Printed House
  2. Adaloudis Max, Bonnin Roca Jaime (2021-05)
    Sustainability Tradeoffs in the Adoption of 3D Concrete Printing in the Construction Industry
  3. Agustí-Juan Isolda, Müller Florian, Hack Norman, Wangler Timothy et al. (2017-04)
    Potential Benefits of Digital Fabrication for Complex Structures:
    Environmental Assessment of a Robotically Fabricated Concrete Wall
  4. Avrutis Daniel, Nazari Ali, Sanjayan Jay (2019-02)
    Industrial Adoption of 3D Concrete Printing in the Australian Market
  5. Batikha Mustafa, Jotangia Rahul, Baaj Mohamad, Mousleh Ibrahim (2021-12)
    3D Concrete Printing for Sustainable and Economical Construction:
    A Comparative Study
  6. Bhattacherjee Shantanu, Basavaraj Anusha, Rahul Attupurathu, Santhanam Manu et al. (2021-06)
    Sustainable Materials for 3D Concrete Printing
  7. Bos Freek, Wolfs Robert, Ahmed Zeeshan, Salet Theo (2016-08)
    Additive Manufacturing of Concrete in Construction:
    Potentials and Challenges of 3D Concrete Printing
  8. Delgado Camacho Daniel, Clayton Patricia, Brien William, Seepersad Carolyn et al. (2018-02)
    Applications of Additive Manufacturing in the Construction Industry:
    A Forward-Looking Review
  9. Gebhard Lukas, Mata-Falcón Jaime, Anton Ana-Maria, Dillenburger Benjamin et al. (2021-04)
    Structural Behavior of 3D Printed Concrete Beams with Various Reinforcement-Strategies
  10. Liu Siyu, Lu Bing, Li Hongliang, Pan Zehua et al. (2022-03)
    A Comparative Study on Environmental Performance of 3D Printing and Conventional Casting of Concrete Products with Industrial Wastes
  11. Mohammad Malek, Masad Eyad, Ghamdi Sami (2020-12)
    3D Concrete Printing Sustainability:
    A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Four Construction Method Scenarios
  12. Muñoz Ivan, Madrid Javier, Muñiz Manuel, Uhart Maylis et al. (2021-01)
    Life Cycle Assessment of Integrated Additive-Subtractive Concrete 3D Printing
  13. Schutter Geert, Lesage Karel, Mechtcherine Viktor, Nerella Venkatesh et al. (2018-08)
    Vision of 3D Printing with Concrete:
    Technical, Economic and Environmental Potentials
  14. Silva Wilson, Kaasgaard Martin, Andersen Thomas (2022-06)
    Sustainable 3D Concrete Printing with Large Aggregates
  15. Tinoco Matheus, Mendonça Érica, Fernandez Letízia, Caldas Lucas et al. (2022-04)
    Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Sustainability of Cementitious Materials for 3D Concrete Printing:
    A Systematic Literature Review
  16. Weng Yiwei, Li Mingyang, Ruan Shaoqin, Wong Teck et al. (2020-03)
    Comparative Economic, Environmental and Productivity-Assessment of a Concrete Bathroom Unit Fabricated Through 3D Printing and a Pre-Cast Approach

9 Citations

  1. Bradford Katy, Gentry Russell, Alon Lola, Kurtis Kimberly (2025-08)
    Construction 3D Printing Material Selection:
    Minimizing Cost and Carbon Footprint of Residential Wall Assemblies
  2. Girskas Giedrius, Kligys Modestas (2025-06)
    3D Concrete Printing Review:
    Equipment, Materials, Mix Design, and Properties
  3. Wu Mushuang, Wang Zixiao, Chen Yuxuan, Zhu Mengyu et al. (2024-11)
    Effect of Steel-Slag on Rheological and Mechanical Properties of Sulfoaluminate-Cement-Based Sustainable 3D Printing Concrete
  4. Kamra Juhi, Mani Ambica, Tripathi V. (2024-06)
    3D Printing:
    A Boon or a Bane for Sustainable Construction
  5. Khan Mehran, McNally Ciaran (2024-05)
    Recent Developments on Low-Carbon 3D Printing Concrete:
    Revolutionizing Construction Through Innovative Technology
  6. Souza Eduarda, Ribeiro Borges Paulo, Stengel Thorsten, Nematollahi Behzad et al. (2024-03)
    3D Printed Sustainable Low-Cost Materials for Construction of Affordable Social Housing in Brazil:
    Potential, Challenges, and Research Needs
  7. Gamage Kumari, Fawzia Sabrina, Zahra Tatheer, Teixeira Muge et al. (2024-02)
    Advancement in Sustainable 3D Concrete Printing:
    A Review on Materials, Challenges, and Current Progress in Australia
  8. Zhou Wen, Zhu He, Hu Wei-Hsiu, Wollaston Ryan et al. (2024-02)
    Low-Carbon, Expansive Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) In the Context of 3D Printing
  9. Wang Chaofan, Chen Bing, Vo Thanh, Rezania Mohammad (2023-07)
    Mechanical Anisotropy, Rheology and Carbon Footprint of 3D Printable Concrete:
    A Review

BibTeX
@article{gang_gado_lewi.2023.3PHUPfCMitCS,
  author            = "Ankita Gangotra and Emanuela del Gado and Joanna I. Lewis",
  title             = "3D Printing Has Untapped Potential for Climate Mitigation in the Cement Sector",
  doi               = "10.1038/s44172-023-00054-7",
  year              = "2023",
  journal           = "Communications Engineering",
  volume            = "2",
  number            = "1",
}
Formatted Citation

A. Gangotra, E. del Gado and J. I. Lewis, “3D Printing Has Untapped Potential for Climate Mitigation in the Cement Sector”, Communications Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s44172-023-00054-7.

Gangotra, Ankita, Emanuela del Gado, and Joanna I. Lewis. “3D Printing Has Untapped Potential for Climate Mitigation in the Cement Sector”. Communications Engineering 2, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-023-00054-7.