Skip to content

Gypsum-Cement-Pozzolan Composites for 3D Printing (2024-06)

Properties and Life Cycle Assessment

10.3390/jcs8060212

 Šahmenko Genādijs, Puzule Līga,  Sapata Alise, Šlosbergs Pēteris,  Bumanis Girts,  Šinka Māris,  Bajāre Diāna
Journal Article - Journal of Composites Science, Vol. 8, Iss. 6, No. 212

Abstract

Over the past decade, 3D printing with concrete has been widely adopted worldwide. The primary drivers for this innovation are the reduction in manual labor and the more efficient use of natural resources. New materials that are suitable for 3D printing are developed, which are characterized by rapid setting and robust physical and mechanical properties. In this study, for the first time, ternary gypsum–cement–pozzolanic (GCP) composites were developed and evaluated for use in 3D printing. These composites are associated with durability in water as Portland cement (PC) while maintaining the rapid hardening properties of gypsum. Two types of secondary gypsum— recycled plasterboard gypsum (RG) and phosphogypsum (PG)—were used as the calcium hemihydrate component. The compressive strength test showed that 37 MPa can be achieved, which is comparable to that of traditional PC-based 3D printable mixtures. For the first time in a 3D print test, it was experimentally proved that GCP mixtures have good stability and buildability up to 35 layers. According to Life Cycle Analysis, elaborated material gives a carbon footprint reduction of up to 40%, compared to traditional PC mortar, thus supporting the sustainable use of this innovative composite.

12 References

  1. Bos Freek, Kruger Jacques, Lucas Sandra, Zijl Gideon (2021-04)
    Juxtaposing Fresh Material-Characterisation-Methods for Buildability-Assessment of 3D Printable Cementitious Mortars
  2. Cao Chenyu, Sun Dongsheng, Xian Zhijun, Zhang Hengyu (2022-12)
    A Brief Review of 3D Printed Concrete
  3. Cho Seung, Kruger Jacques, Bester Frederick, Heever Marchant et al. (2020-07)
    A Compendious Rheo-Mechanical Test for Printability-Assessment of 3D Printable Concrete
  4. Genc Gokhan, Demircan Ruya, Beyhan Figen, Kaplan Gökhan (2023-10)
    Assessment of the Sustainability and Producibility of Adobe-Constructions Reinforced with Ca-Based Binders:
    Environmental Life-Cycle-Analysis and 3D Printability
  5. Ivanova Irina, Ivaniuk Egor, Bisetti Sameercharan, Nerella Venkatesh et al. (2022-03)
    Comparison Between Methods for Indirect Assessment of Buildability in Fresh 3D Printed Mortar and Concrete
  6. Jo Jun, Jo Byung, Cho Woohyun, Kim Jung-Hoon (2020-03)
    Development of a 3D Printer for Concrete Structures:
    Laboratory Testing of Cementitious Materials
  7. Kruger Jacques, Zeranka Stephan, Zijl Gideon (2019-07)
    3D Concrete Printing:
    A Lower-Bound Analytical Model for Buildability-Performance-Quantification
  8. Ma Xiaosong, Tan Linzhen, Lu Yuanjing, Yao Wu et al. (2023-03)
    Upcycling of Waste Plasterboard for the Synthesis of High-Quality Gypsum-Based 3D Printing-Powder
  9. Shakor Pshtiwan, Nejadi Shami, Paul Gavin, Sanjayan Jay (2019-12)
    Dimensional Accuracy, Flowability, Wettability, and Porosity in Inkjet 3DP for Gypsum and Cement Mortar Materials
  10. Spuriņa Ella, Šinka Māris, Ziemelis Krists, Vanags Andris et al. (2022-09)
    The Effects of Air-Entraining Agent on Fresh and Hardened Properties of 3D Concrete
  11. Zaid Osama, Ouni Mohamed (2024-04)
    Advancements in 3D Printing of Cementitious Materials:
    A Review of Mineral Additives, Properties, and Systematic Developments
  12. Zhang Yu, Zhang Yunsheng, She Wei, Yang Lin et al. (2019-01)
    Rheological and Hardened Properties of the High-Thixotropy 3D Printing Concrete

4 Citations

  1. Tarhan Yeşim, Atalay Berrin (2025-09)
    Phosphogypsum and Borogypsum as Additives for Sustainable and High-Performance 3D-Printable Concrete
  2. Anop Darya, Sadenova Marzhan, Beisekenov Nail, Rudenko Olga et al. (2025-07)
    Additive Manufacturing as an Alternative to Core Sampling in Concrete Strength Assessment
  3. Rajendran Naveenkumar, Runge Troy, Bergman Richard, Nepal Prakash et al. (2025-03)
    Economic and Environmental Impact Analysis of Cellulose Nanocrystal-Reinforced Cementitious Mixture in 3D Printing
  4. Sapata Alise, Šinka Māris, Šahmenko Genādijs, Korat Bensa Lidija et al. (2025-02)
    Establishing Benchmark Properties for 3D-Printed Concrete:
    A Study of Printability, Strength, and Durability

BibTeX
@article{sahm_puzu_sapa_slos.2024.GCPCf3P,
  author            = "Genādijs Šahmenko and Līga Puzule and Alise Sapata and Pēteris Šlosbergs and Girts Bumanis and Māris Šinka and Diāna Bajāre",
  title             = "Gypsum-Cement-Pozzolan Composites for 3D Printing: Properties and Life Cycle Assessment",
  doi               = "10.3390/jcs8060212",
  year              = "2024",
  journal           = "Journal of Composites Science",
  volume            = "8",
  number            = "6",
  pages             = "212",
}
Formatted Citation

G. Šahmenko, “Gypsum-Cement-Pozzolan Composites for 3D Printing: Properties and Life Cycle Assessment”, Journal of Composites Science, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 212, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jcs8060212.

Šahmenko, Genādijs, Līga Puzule, Alise Sapata, Pēteris Šlosbergs, Girts Bumanis, Māris Šinka, and Diāna Bajāre. “Gypsum-Cement-Pozzolan Composites for 3D Printing: Properties and Life Cycle Assessment”. Journal of Composites Science 8, no. 6 (2024): 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8060212.