Skip to content

Processing of Cementitious Materials for 3D Concrete Printing (2019-06)

10.1007/978-981-19-0561-2_26

 Dey Dhrutiman,  Srinivas Dodda,  Panda Biranchi,  Sitharam Thallak
Contribution - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Advanced Manufacturing, pp. 283-291

Abstract

Industry 4.0 is considered a new industrial stage in which vertical and horizontal manufacturing processes integration with information and communication technologies can help industries to achieve higher performance. Among these industries, the construction industry is regarded as the horizontal industry as it serves other industries through building infrastructure or other ‘constructed assets’ [1]. Butitisvery unfortunate to learn that the construction industry is more monopolistic in nature and always gives resistance to change for any technological innovations leading to lower productivity and higher cost [2]. Though there has been some improvement in the enterprise or company level strategies to smoothen the supply and demand side requirement, it is always lagging other sectors as there is no scientific change in the conventional construction practices [3]. In addition, the construction industry is not sustainable from economic, social, or environmental perspectives [4]. Consequently, the construction industry is shaken up by multiple global megatrends such as the affordable housing crisis (which is increasing by 2,00,000 people per day) and high greenhouse gas emissions (30% of the total) [1]. Considering all these facts, the building and construction industry is seen to be under a moral obligation to transform and adopt digitalization to its maximum extent. Out of all digital construction methods, the use of 3D printing in construction comes out to be a disruptive technology that starts with the digital design file (CAD) and follows a complete automated cycle to print the entire building with very little human intervention. Concrete 3D printing (3DCP) is a novel construction method that uses the principle of additive manufacturing to build the complete structure in a layered fashion, following the 3D model. Unlike conventional construction methods, mold erection is not required in 3DCP. The application of 3DCP mainly focused on the construction sector for creating modular houses, bridges, offices, public schools, bus stops, low-cost toilet units, etc. [5]. In most of the applications, design freedom and sustainable structures are found to be the two key factors for successful implementation. Concrete printing can be divided into different groups of technologies according to the materials used and their deposition technique. In the case of cement-based material, mainly two techniques have been used so far which are (1) powder-based and (2) extrusion-based printing [6]. This method is the most frequently used one in the construction industry, which was famously known as Contour Crafting (CC) in the initial days [7]. Though this technique follows a similar deposition style used in the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process, the main difference lies in the solidification mechanism of concrete material, which does not set instantaneously, rather stays in an intermediate state, leading to a challenging problem for balancing extrudability and buildability criteria [8]. However, with R&D contribution by industries and academicians, many emerging problems (material design [9], processing technology [10], Reinforcement placement [11], Mechanical and durability properties [12]) have been addressed, and by the end of 2020, a total of 29 houses have been built around the globe using 3D printing technology [13, 14]. Based on current state of the art, Fig. 1 marks the countries involved in 3DCP research and demonstration [5].

9 References

  1. Bos Freek, Ahmed Zeeshan, Wolfs Robert, Salet Theo (2017-06)
    3D Printing Concrete with Reinforcement
  2. Bos Freek, Wolfs Robert, Ahmed Zeeshan, Salet Theo (2016-08)
    Additive Manufacturing of Concrete in Construction:
    Potentials and Challenges of 3D Concrete Printing
  3. Hwang Dooil, Khoshnevis Behrokh (2004-09)
    Concrete Wall Fabrication by Contour Crafting
  4. Panda Biranchi, Tan Ming (2018-03)
    Experimental Study on Mix Proportion and Fresh Properties of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer for 3D Concrete Printing
  5. Perrot Arnaud, Rangeard Damien, Nerella Venkatesh, Mechtcherine Viktor (2019-02)
    Extrusion of Cement-Based Materials:
    An Overview
  6. Rahul Attupurathu, Santhanam Manu, Meena Hitesh, Ghani Zimam (2018-12)
    3D Printable Concrete:
    Mixture-Design and Test-Methods
  7. Tay Yi, Li Mingyang, Tan Ming (2019-04)
    Effect of Printing Parameters in 3D Concrete Printing:
    Printing Region and Support Structures
  8. Tay Yi, Panda Biranchi, Paul Suvash, Mohamed Nisar et al. (2017-05)
    3D Printing Trends in Building and Construction Industry:
    A Review
  9. Tay Yi, Qian Ye, Tan Ming (2019-05)
    Printability-Region for 3D Concrete Printing Using Slump- and Slump-Flow-Test

9 Citations

  1. Adamtsevich Liubov, Pustovgar Andrey, Adamtsevich Aleksey (2024-10)
    Assessing the Prospects and Risks of Delivering Sustainable Urban Development Through 3D Concrete Printing Implementation
  2. Srinivas Dodda, Ventrapragada Durga, Panda Biranchi, Sitharam Thallak (2024-07)
    A Study on the Effect of Mixture Constituents on Washout-Resistance, Mechanical, and Transport Properties in the Context of Underwater 3D Concrete Printing
  3. Kumar Devalla Tharun, Srinivas Dodda, Panda Biranchi, Sitharam Thallak (2023-04)
    Investigation on the Flexural and Tensile Performance of 3D Printable Cementitious Mixtures Considering the Effect of Fiber-Distribution
  4. Dey Dhrutiman, Sahu Akshay, Prakash Srajan, Panda Biranchi (2023-03)
    A Study into the Effect of Material-Deposition-Methods on Hardened Properties of 3D Printed Concrete
  5. Boddepalli Uday, Gandhi Indu, Panda Biranchi (2022-12)
    Stability of Three-Dimensional Printable Foam-Concrete as Function of Surfactant Characteristics
  6. Srinivas Dodda, Dey Dhrutiman, Panda Biranchi, Sitharam Thallak (2022-12)
    Printability, Thermal and Compressive Strength Properties of Cementitious Materials:
    A Comparative Study with Silica-Fume and Limestone
  7. Niranjan Y., Channabasavanna S., Krishnapillai Shankar, Velmurugan Ramachandran et al. (2022-10)
    The Unprecedented Role of 3D Printing Technology in Fighting the COVID-19 Pandemic:
    A Comprehensive Review
  8. Boddepalli Uday, Panda Biranchi, Gandhi Indu (2022-09)
    Rheology and Printability of Portland-Cement-Based Materials:
    A Review
  9. Dey Dhrutiman, Srinivas Dodda, Boddepalli Uday, Panda Biranchi et al. (2022-09)
    3D Printability of Ternary-Portland-Cement Mixes Containing Fly-Ash and Limestone

BibTeX
@inproceedings{dey_srin_pand_sith.2023.PoCMf3CP,
  author            = "Dhrutiman Dey and Dodda Srinivas and Biranchi Narayan Panda and Thallak G. Sitharam",
  title             = "Processing of Cementitious Materials for 3D Concrete Printing",
  doi               = "10.1007/978-981-19-0561-2_26",
  year              = "2023",
  pages             = "283--291",
  booktitle         = "Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Advanced Manufacturing",
  editor            = "Amaresh Chakrabarti and Satyam Suwas and Manish Arora",
}
Formatted Citation

D. Dey, D. Srinivas, B. N. Panda and T. G. Sitharam, “Processing of Cementitious Materials for 3D Concrete Printing”, in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Advanced Manufacturing, 2023, pp. 283–291. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-0561-2_26.

Dey, Dhrutiman, Dodda Srinivas, Biranchi Narayan Panda, and Thallak G. Sitharam. “Processing of Cementitious Materials for 3D Concrete Printing”. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Advanced Manufacturing, edited by Amaresh Chakrabarti, Satyam Suwas, and Manish Arora, 283–91, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0561-2_26.