A Path-Planning-Optimization Framework for Concrete-Based Additive Manufacturing Processes (2020-11)¶
, , ,
Journal Article - Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 51, pp. 649-654
Abstract
Concrete based Additive Manufacturing (AM) is an emerging technological sector including numerous potential application fields, varying from buildings to facades and furniture. Path planning optimization of Concrete based AM is considered as a milestone, towards further automation and utilization of the technology. The current study presents a modular framework for the holistic multi-level optimization of path planning for concrete AM. Steps are described in detail and include strategies for the selection of a near optimum path and selection of acceptable process parameters, along with controlling actions of a cable robot based concrete AM process head. Also, following outcomes derived from the path strategy, an appropriate building block geometry is generated through design successive approximations. These building blocks fulfil (mechanical and thermal) functional requirements as well as they meet buildability criteria, with emphasis on minimizing idle times. Finally, a software platform supporting the aforementioned activities has been implemented and is presented herein. It provides an interface based on Web-Services, achieving portability of data and functionalities.
¶
6 References
- Foteinopoulos Panagis, Esnault Vivien, Komineas George, Papacharalampopoulos Alexios et al. (2020-01)
Cement-Based Additive Manufacturing:
Experimental Investigation of Process Quality - Foteinopoulos Panagis, Papacharalampopoulos Alexios, Stavropoulos Panagiotis (2019-06)
Block-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process Applied for the Evaluation of Construction Sector Additive Manufacturing - Khoshnevis Behrokh (2003-11)
Automated Construction by Contour Crafting:
Related Robotics and Information Technologies - Lim Sungwoo, Buswell Richard, Le Thanh, Austin Simon et al. (2011-07)
Developments in Construction-Scale Additive Manufacturing Processes - Lindemann Hendrik, Gerbers Roman, Ibrahim Serhat, Dietrich Franz et al. (2018-09)
Development of a Shotcrete 3D Printing (SC3DP) Technology for Additive Manufacturing of Reinforced Freeform Concrete Structures - Zhang Jing, Khoshnevis Behrokh (2012-09)
Optimal Machine Operation Planning for Construction by Contour Crafting
5 Citations
- Wan Qian, Wang Li, Huang Xiaodong, Wu Hao et al. (2025-10)
Shape Optimization Based on Isogeometric Analysis for 3D Concrete Printing:
A Design Method for Printing-Friendly Structure - Sari Mustika, Berawi Mohammed, Taswin William, Saroji Gunawan et al. (2025-09)
Work Breakdown Structure and Construction Process Framework for a Hybrid 3D-Printed Modular Building - Wan Qian, Yang Wenwei, Wang Li, Ma Guowei (2023-04)
Global Continuous Path-Planning for 3D Concrete Printing Multi-Branched Structure - Lachmayer Lukas, Ekanayaka Virama, Hürkamp André, Raatz Annika (2021-11)
Approach to an Optimized Printing Path for Additive Manufacturing in Construction Utilizing FEM Modeling - Muñoz Ivan, Madrid Javier, Muñiz Manuel, Uhart Maylis et al. (2021-01)
Life Cycle Assessment of Integrated Additive-Subtractive Concrete 3D Printing
BibTeX
@article{papa_bika_fote_stav.2020.APPOFfCBAMP,
author = "Alexios Papacharalampopoulos and Harry Bikas and Panagis Foteinopoulos and Panagiotis Stavropoulos",
title = "A Path-Planning-Optimization Framework for Concrete-Based Additive Manufacturing Processes",
doi = "10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.091",
year = "2020",
journal = "Procedia Manufacturing",
volume = "51",
pages = "649--654",
}
Formatted Citation
A. Papacharalampopoulos, H. Bikas, P. Foteinopoulos and P. Stavropoulos, “A Path-Planning-Optimization Framework for Concrete-Based Additive Manufacturing Processes”, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 51, pp. 649–654, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.091.
Papacharalampopoulos, Alexios, Harry Bikas, Panagis Foteinopoulos, and Panagiotis Stavropoulos. “A Path-Planning-Optimization Framework for Concrete-Based Additive Manufacturing Processes”. Procedia Manufacturing 51 (2020): 649–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.091.