Skip to content

3D Printed Stay-in-Place Formwork for Topologically Optimized Concrete Slabs (2016-11)

10.3929/ethz-b-000237082

 Jipa Mihail-Andrei,  Bernhard Mathias,  Meibodi Mania,  Dillenburger Benjamin
Contribution - Proceedings of the 2016 TxA Emerging Design + Technology Conference

Abstract

Material efficiency is becoming a critical design driver in the construction industry. While many strategiesfor improving material efficiency focus on the end of a building s lifecycle (recycling materials, reusing compo-nents, reducing waste, extending life spans, etc.), thereis also great potential for reducing material use in theearly design phases. This is especially significant for materials that are difficult to recycle, such as concrete (Allwood et al. 2011).The usual means for achieving material reductionwith concrete are hollow-core construction systems,pre-stressing, and the use of lightweight concrete.Computational methods, such as the optimization ofsize, shape, and topology, can also be used to ensure theefficient distribution of concrete for a given part. While significant material reduction can be achieved with these methods, the resulting geometries are often so intricatethat fabrication becomes problematic (Dombernowskyand Søndergaard, 2011).The designer is confronted with the compromisebetween optimal material distribution and fabricationconstraints. Subtractive (e.g. milling) and formative(e.g. casting and moulding) fabrication processesimpose significant manufacturing constraints on the optimized form and its topological features. Three-axismilling, for example, is limited by tool-head accessibilityand therefore cannot be used to fabricate undercuts.Five-axis milling is more tolerant of undercuts, butoften parts must be split into smaller subdivisions toprevent clashes with the larger tool heads. Formativefabrication has directional limitations determinedby the rheology of the casting material and by thedemoulding process (fig. 1). However, 3D printing, or additive manufacturing, is aprocess that promises almost no fabrication constraints,potentially enabling the production of topologically optimized complex geometries. The aim of this research isto demonstrate that large-scale parts can be fabricatedwith additive manufacturing. To investigate this hypoth-esis, two concrete slab components were designed withthe aid of topology optimization algorithms, and fabri-cated using 3D printing.

0 References

24 Citations

  1. Sakha Mahsa, Raza Saim, Wang Xiaomeng, Fan Haifeng et al. (2025-10)
    Design Optimization and Assessment of Stay-in-Place 3D Printed Concrete Formwork for Slabs
  2. İlerisoy Zeynep, Takva Çağatay, Top Semahat, Gökgöz Berru et al. (2025-08)
    The Effectiveness of 3D Concrete Printing Technology in Architectural Design:
    Different Corner-Wall Combinations in 3D Printed Elements and Geometric Form Configurations in Residential Buildings
  3. Ramirez Rodriguez Fatima, Pancho Paolo, Sanchez Daniela, Poudel Suman et al. (2025-02)
    Design and Development of a Lean Robotic Cell for Concrete 3D Printing
  4. Takva Çağatay, Top Semahat, Gökgöz Berru, Gebel Şeyma et al. (2024-11)
    Applicability of 3D Concrete Printing Technology in Building Construction with Different Architectural Design Decisions in Housing
  5. Jipa Mihail-Andrei, Anton Ana-Maria, Gebhard Lukas, Dillenburger Benjamin (2024-09)
    The Nubian Slab:
    3D Concrete Printed Stay-in-Place Formwork for Vaulted Slabs
  6. Breseghello Luca, Hajikarimian Hamed, Naboni Roberto (2024-05)
    3DLightSlab:
    Design to 3D Concrete Printing Workflow for Stress-Driven Ribbed Slabs
  7. Gappmeier Peter, Reichenbach Sara, Kromoser Benjamin (2024-03)
    Advances in Formwork Automation, Structure and Materials in Concrete Construction
  8. Li Yu, Wu Hao, Xie Xinjie, Zhang Liming et al. (2024-02)
    FloatArch:
    A Cable-Supported, Unreinforced, and Re-Assemblable 3D Printed Concrete Structure Designed Using Multi-Material Topology-Optimization
  9. Huber Tobias, Burger Joris, Mata-Falcón Jaime, Kaufmann Walter (2023-03)
    Structural Design and Testing of Material-Optimized Ribbed RC Slabs with 3D Printed Formwork
  10. Kaliyavaradhan Senthil, Ambily Parukutty, Prem Prabhat, Ghodke Swapnil (2022-08)
    Test-Methods for 3D Printable Concrete
  11. Khosravani Mohammad, Haghighi Azadeh (2022-08)
    Large-Scale Automated Additive Construction:
    Overview, Robotic Solutions, Sustainability, and Future Prospect
  12. Bi Minghao, Tran Jonathan, Xia Lingwei, Ma Guowei et al. (2022-06)
    Topology-Optimization for 3D Concrete Printing with Various Manufacturing-Constraints
  13. Nodehi Mehrab, Ozbakkaloglu Togay, Gholampour Aliakbar (2022-04)
    Effect of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on Properties of 3D Printed Conventional and Alkali-Activated Concrete:
    A Review
  14. Pajonk Adam, Prieto Alejandro, Blum Ulrich, Knaack Ulrich (2021-11)
    Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing in Architecture and Construction:
    A Review
  15. Dobrzanski James, Buswell Richard, Cavalaro Sergio, Kinnell Peter et al. (2021-09)
    Milling a Cement-Based 3D Printable Mortar in Its Green State Using a Ball-Nosed Cutter
  16. Bedarf Patrick, Dutto Alessandro, Zanini Michele, Dillenburger Benjamin (2021-08)
    Foam 3D Printing for Construction:
    A Review of Applications, Materials, and Processes
  17. Voney Vera, Odaglia Pietro, Brumaud Coralie, Dillenburger Benjamin et al. (2021-02)
    From Casting to 3D Printing Geopolymers:
    A Proof of Concept
  18. Plessis Anton, Babafemi Adewumi, Paul Suvash, Panda Biranchi et al. (2020-12)
    Biomimicry for 3D Concrete Printing:
    A Review and Perspective
  19. Liu Yan, Jewett Jackson, Carstensen Josephine (2020-07)
    Experimental Investigation of Topology-Optimized Deep Reinforced Concrete Beams with Reduced Concrete Volume
  20. Odaglia Pietro, Voney Vera, Dillenburger Benjamin, Habert Guillaume (2020-07)
    Advances in Binder-Jet 3D Printing of Non-Cementitious Materials
  21. Voney Vera, Odaglia Pietro, Brumaud Coralie, Dillenburger Benjamin et al. (2020-07)
    Geopolymer Formulation for Binder-Jet 3D Printing
  22. Jipa Mihail-Andrei, Giacomarra Federico, Giesecke Rena, Chousou Georgia et al. (2019-06)
    3D Printed Formwork for Bespoke Concrete Stairs
  23. Agustí-Juan Isolda, Jipa Mihail-Andrei, Habert Guillaume (2018-11)
    Environmental Assessment of Multi-Functional Building Elements Constructed with Digital Fabrication Techniques
  24. Jipa Mihail-Andrei, Bernhard Mathias, Dillenburger Benjamin (2017-11)
    Submillimetre Formwork:
    3D Printed Plastic Formwork for Concrete Elements

BibTeX
@inproceedings{jipa_bern_meib_dill.2016.3PSiPFfTOCS,
  author            = "Mihail-Andrei Jipa and Mathias Bernhard and Mania Aghaei Meibodi and Benjamin Dillenburger",
  title             = "3D Printed Stay-in-Place Formwork for Topologically Optimized Concrete Slabs",
  doi               = "10.3929/ethz-b-000237082",
  year              = "2016",
  booktitle         = "Proceedings of the 2016 TxA Emerging Design + Technology Conference",
  editor            = "Kory Bieg",
}
Formatted Citation

M.-A. Jipa, M. Bernhard, M. A. Meibodi and B. Dillenburger, “3D Printed Stay-in-Place Formwork for Topologically Optimized Concrete Slabs”, in Proceedings of the 2016 TxA Emerging Design + Technology Conference, 2016. doi: 10.3929/ethz-b-000237082.

Jipa, Mihail-Andrei, Mathias Bernhard, Mania Aghaei Meibodi, and Benjamin Dillenburger. “3D Printed Stay-in-Place Formwork for Topologically Optimized Concrete Slabs”. In Proceedings of the 2016 TxA Emerging Design + Technology Conference, edited by Kory Bieg, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000237082.